City: |
Dublin,
Ireland |
Organization: |
·
School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen's University Belfast ·
Local Government Management Agency, Ireland ·
School of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Policy,
University College Dublin |
Project
Start Date: |
2017
(Inferred) |
Project
End Date: |
October
2018 (Paper submitted) |
Reference: |
Waldron, R., O’Donoghue-Hynes, B., & Redmond, D.
(2019). Emergency homeless shelter use in the Dublin region 2012–2016:
Utilizing a cluster analysis of administrative data. Cities, 94(October
2018), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.06.008. |
Problem: |
Ireland
has experienced a dramatic rise in homelessness since the 2008 economic
recession, with an increase of 130% in demand for emergency homeless
accommodation from July, 2014 to December, 2016 alone. Dublin accounts for
over 70% of the total homeless population of the country. Understanding the
patterns of emergency accommodation use among the city’s homeless population
will help Dublin’s municipal government create meaningful strategies that
allocate limited resources to the actual needs of those experiencing
homelessness. |
Technical
Solution: |
· K-Means Cluster Analysis was conducted within SPSS to create three unique clusters of homeless clients using the Z scores for the ‘total nights stayed” and ‘total homeless episodes” variables, applying Kuhn & Culhane’s (1998) cluster typology · Chi-Square tests examined whether statistically significant relationships exist between the homeless clusters and the demographic and patterns of use variables. Relationships were considered significant at an alpha level of 0.05 · Cramer’s V tests were conducted to measure the strength of association between variables within clusters |
Datasets
Used: |
|
Outcome: |
Alignment between Dublin cluster patterns and those
from similar studies in cities in U.S., Canada, and Denmark. K-Means
Clusters: · Transitional: o 78% of clients; 35% of total nights o 72% total nights stayed: < 100 days; 75% of total homeless episodes: = 1 o 64% number of emergency accommodations providers used: 1-2 o 60% Irish · Episodic: o 10% of clients; 15% of total nights o 56% total nights stayed: 100 > 500; 53% total homeless episodes: 3 < 5 o 40% number of emergency accommodations providers used: 11-20 o 65% Young adults; 33% Middle age o 77% Irish; 4% non-EEA · Chronic: o 12% of clients; 50% of total nights o K-Means51% total nights stayed: 500 >1000, 11% > 1000 o 17% number of emergency accommodations providers used: 11-20 o 58% Young adults; 39% Middle age o 83% Irish; 6% non-EEA Significant
variables within clusters, by Chi-Square and/or Cramer’s V values: ·
Homeless
Nights o X2 = 789.057, p = 0.000 o Cramer’s
V = 0.546 ·
Homeless
Episodes o X2 = 8359.200, p = 0.000 o Cramer’s
V = 0.546 ·
Accommodation
providers o Cramer’s
V = 0.416 · Age o X2 = 504.479, p = 0.000 · Country of origin o X2 = 451.949, p = 0.000 |
Issues
that arose: |
· The dataset only captured cases of reported homelessness where an individual has sought emergency accommodation support, and thereby logged into the PASS system. Therefore, the study does not capture the ‘hidden homeless’ e.g. individuals couch surfing or sleeping outside · Until 2014, the PASS system only logged individual adults contacting homeless services, and did not distinguish if they were accompanied by children or not, so difficult to identify the number of families experiencing homelessness from 2012 to 2014. · Difficult to link data from PASS to other datasets relating to health or social protection systems due to privacy issues, so study was limited in demographic data, particularly around reasons for homelessness e.g. physical or mental health issues |
Status: |
Terminated.
|
Entered
by: |
October
30, 2020: Malini Pandya, malini.pandya@utoronto.ca |
CEM1002,
Civil Engineering, University of Toronto
Contact: msf@eil.utoronto.ca